Sample Report

This is what you receive.

A complete White Glove Insights™ Report — the clinical artifact delivered to every patient within 24 hours. Structured, source-linked, and co-signed by two fellowship-trained physicians.

Start Your Own Review Download Sample PDF

This report uses a fictional patient with synthetic data. All physician names, hospital references, and clinical values are illustrative.

WHITE GLOVE INSIGHTS™ REPORT
Table of Contents

15 pages · 3 risk models · 75+ extracted variables · Every data point source-linked

WHITE GLOVE INSIGHTS™ REPORT
Patient Summary
Prepared for: James R. Mitchell
Date of Report: January 15, 2026
Reviewing Physicians: [Redacted], MD, FACS — Cardiac Surgery | [Redacted], MD, FACC — Interventional Cardiology
PatientJames R. Mitchell
Age / Gender / BMI72 · Male · 28.4
Referring Physician[Redacted], MD — Cardiology
Primary Diagnoses:
  1. Severe aortic stenosis (AVA 0.7 cm², mean gradient 48 mmHg)
  2. Three-vessel coronary artery disease (LAD 90%, LCx 85%, RCA 70%)
  3. Moderate left ventricular dysfunction (EF 40%)
Surgical Recommendation Received:

Combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR-CABG)

Section 1 of 8

Your complete clinical picture — in one place.

Before any analysis begins, the report assembles every relevant clinical detail into a structured summary. Diagnoses, medical history, current medications, and the surgical recommendation you received — all verified against the source documents.

KEY INSIGHT

Every value on this page links to the exact page and document it was extracted from. Nothing is assumed.

Diagnostic Confirmation
Echocardiographic Data
Aortic Valve Area (AVA)0.7 cm² · Severe
Mean Gradient48 mmHg
Peak Velocity4.8 m/s
LV Ejection Fraction40%
LV End-Diastolic Dimension56 mm
Mitral RegurgitationMild (1+)
Catheterization Findings
Left Main30% stenosis
LAD90% proximal stenosis
LCx85% mid-vessel stenosis
RCA70% mid stenosis (prior PCI 2019)
LVEDP22 mmHg
Key Labs
Creatinine / GFR1.4 mg/dL · GFR 52
HbA1c7.2%
Hemoglobin12.8 g/dL
Section 2 of 8

Independent verification of every diagnosis.

We don’t take the referring diagnosis at face value. Every diagnostic finding is verified against the original imaging, lab, and catheterization data — because errors in the starting data propagate into surgical decisions.

KEY INSIGHT

In 18% of cases, our independent review identifies a diagnostic discrepancy that changes the risk calculation or alters the recommended approach.

Surgical Risk Quantification
STS-PROM
5.7%
Predicted Mortality
EuroSCORE II
7.2%
Predicted Mortality
AATS
4.9%
Predicted Mortality
Additional Predicted Outcomes (STS)
Permanent Stroke2.1%
Renal Failure4.3%
Prolonged Ventilation18.2%
Deep Sternal Wound Infection0.4%
Reoperation5.1%
Morbidity or Mortality28.4%
Section 3 of 8

Triple risk scoring — calculated from YOUR data.

We calculate STS-PROM, EuroSCORE II, and AATS risk scores using 75+ variables extracted directly from your records. These are patient-specific scores — not generic risk categories. When the models disagree, we explain why.

KEY INSIGHT

Mr. Mitchell's STS-PROM of 5.7% places him in the intermediate-risk category. Combined with moderate LV dysfunction and 3-vessel CAD, this makes the AVR-CABG decision nuanced.

Treatment Alternatives & Analysis
Option A: Surgical AVR + CABG (Recommended)

Combined open-heart procedure. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement with 3-vessel coronary bypass (LIMA-LAD, SVG-LCx, SVG-RCA). Single operation, single recovery.

Advantages

Complete revascularization in one procedure. Superior long-term outcomes per SYNTAX data. Addresses both pathologies definitively.

Considerations

Higher short-term morbidity (STS M&M 28.4%). Extended recovery (8–12 weeks). Requires cardiopulmonary bypass.

Option B: TAVR + Staged PCI

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement followed by percutaneous coronary intervention 4–6 weeks later. Two procedures, two recoveries, but each minimally invasive.

Advantages

Each procedure individually lower risk. Faster recovery from each. Avoids sternotomy.

Considerations

Two separate procedures and recovery periods. PCI unlikely to achieve complete revascularization (3-vessel, SYNTAX 34). Dual antiplatelet + TAVR antithrombotic overlap.

Option C: Optimized Medical Management

Aggressive medical therapy with close surveillance. Guideline-directed medical therapy for CAD with watchful waiting for aortic stenosis progression.

Advantages

No procedural risk. Appropriate if patient declines intervention.

Considerations

Symptomatic severe AS carries ~50% 2-year mortality without intervention. Ongoing angina and HF symptoms. Does not address underlying pathology.

Section 4 of 8

Every viable option — compared head-to-head.

The report doesn’t tell you what to do. It maps every viable treatment pathway, quantifies the trade-offs, and presents the evidence for each. Surgical, interventional, and conservative options — all compared against your specific anatomy and risk profile.

KEY INSIGHT

For Mr. Mitchell, three pathways are viable: AVR-CABG (combined), TAVR + staged PCI, and medical management. Each carries different short-term and long-term risk profiles.

Guideline Mapping
Aortic Valve Intervention
IndicationSevere symptomatic AS (AVA <1.0 cm²)
GuidelineACC/AHA 2020 VHD
Class / LOEClass I / Level A
RecommendationAVR is indicated
Coronary Revascularization
Indication3-vessel CAD with LVEF ≤50%
GuidelineACC/AHA 2021 Revasc
Class / LOEClass I / Level B
RecommendationCABG preferred over PCI
TAVR vs. SAVR Decision
Patient Age72 years
STS-PROM5.7% (Intermediate risk)
GuidelineACC/AHA 2020 VHD, §7.3
AssessmentEither TAVR or SAVR reasonable (Class I)
Complicating FactorConcomitant CABG need favors SAVR
Section 5 of 8

Every recommendation mapped to published guidelines.

We don’t just give opinions — we cite the evidence. Every recommendation is mapped to ACC/AHA, ESC/EACTS, and STS clinical practice guidelines with specific class and level of evidence designations.

KEY INSIGHT

Surgical AVR is a Class I recommendation (Level A evidence) for severe symptomatic AS. CABG is Class I for 3-vessel CAD with reduced LVEF. The combination is well-supported.

Surgeon & Facility Matching
Top 3 Matched Programs
1
[Redacted] Medical Center
Major Academic Center · 45 miles
AVR-CABG Volume: 280/yrSTS ★★★
2
[Redacted] Heart Institute
Academic Medical Center · 120 miles
AVR-CABG Volume: 210/yrSTS ★★★
3
[Redacted] Cardiovascular Center
Specialty Center · 85 miles
AVR-CABG Volume: 175/yrSTS ★★
Rankings based on STS Public Reporting, CMS Hospital Compare, and procedure-specific volume data. Names redacted in sample.
Section 6 of 8

The right surgeon for YOUR procedure.

We match you to surgeons and centers based on procedure-specific volume, publicly reported outcomes, and geographic accessibility. Not advertising. Not referral networks. Data.

KEY INSIGHT

For AVR-CABG, center volume matters. Programs performing 200+ AVR-CABG cases annually have mortality rates 40% lower than low-volume programs.

Heart Team Recommendation
CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATION

Proceed with combined surgical aortic valve replacement (bioprosthetic) and coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR-CABG) at a high-volume center (≥200 combined cases/year).

Specific Guidance
Valve TypeBioprosthetic (age 72, avoids anticoagulation)
Graft StrategyLIMA-LAD + SVG ×2 (radial artery conduit considered)
Concomitant ProcedureNone indicated (MR mild, no AF)
TimingWithin 4–6 weeks (symptomatic severe AS)
Pre-Op OptimizationHbA1c <8%, pulmonary rehab, dental clearance
Cardiac Surgeon
[Redacted], MD, FACS
Fellowship-Trained · Cardiac Surgery
Interventional Cardiologist
[Redacted], MD, FACC
Fellowship-Trained · Interventional Cardiology
Section 7 of 8

The Heart Team’s independent conclusion.

Two fellowship-trained physicians — a cardiac surgeon and an interventional cardiologist — independently review the AI analysis and co-sign the final recommendation. This is the ACC/AHA Class I Heart Team standard.

KEY INSIGHT

The Heart Team concurs with the recommendation for surgical AVR-CABG, with specific guidance on valve type, graft strategy, and center selection.

Source Document Index
Transthoracic EchocardiogramDec 3, 2025
Dr. [Redacted], [Redacted] Cardiology12 data points extracted
Left Heart Catheterization ReportDec 10, 2025
[Redacted] Medical Center, Cath Lab8 data points extracted
CT Angiogram (Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis)Dec 12, 2025
[Redacted] Radiology6 data points extracted
Operative Note (PCI to RCA, 2019)Mar 14, 2019
[Redacted] Heart Hospital3 data points extracted
Comprehensive Metabolic PanelDec 8, 2025
[Redacted] Laboratory9 data points extracted
Pulmonary Function TestingNov 22, 2025
[Redacted] Pulmonology4 data points extracted
Referring Cardiologist LetterDec 15, 2025
Dr. [Redacted], MD5 data points extracted
47 data points · 7 source documents · 100% traceable
Section 8 of 8

Complete transparency. Every data point traced to its source.

Every clinical value in the report is linked to the specific document and page from which it was extracted. You — or your physician — can verify any data point by referencing the source index.

KEY INSIGHT

Source-linked provenance is what separates a WhiteGloveMD report from a traditional second opinion. Nothing is assumed. Nothing is unverifiable.

Frequently Asked Questions

About the report.

Ready to see yours?

Every White Glove Insights™ Report is generated from your actual medical records — not a template. Delivered in 24 hours. Inaugural pricing from $495.

View Packages & Pricing Talk to a Specialist