VEST
Vest Prevention of Early Sudden Death Trial
Clinical Question
Population
Patients within 7 days of acute myocardial infarction with an LVEF ≤35% at 108 sites in the United States, Europe, and India.
Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (LifeVest WCD 4000) plus guideline-directed medical therapy
Guideline-directed medical therapy alone
Primary Endpoint
Sudden death or death from ventricular tachyarrhythmia at 90 days
Key Findings
The primary endpoint of arrhythmic death occurred in 1.6% of WCD patients vs 2.4% of control patients (relative risk reduction 35.5%; p=0.18).
All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the WCD group (3.1% vs 4.9%; relative risk reduction 36%; p=0.04).
The WCD delivered appropriate shocks in 1.4% of patients and inappropriate shocks in 0.6% of patients.
Device compliance was suboptimal: median daily wear time was 18.0 hours among WCD patients, with 10.7% of patients not wearing the device at all.
Most sudden deaths in the WCD group occurred when patients were not wearing the device.
Impact on Clinical Practice
Guideline Impact
Limitations
The primary endpoint did not reach statistical significance, making the mortality benefit a secondary finding that requires cautious interpretation.
Suboptimal device compliance (median 18 hours/day) likely diluted the treatment effect and limits conclusions about WCD efficacy when worn consistently.
Unblinded design may have influenced clinical management differently between groups.
How Does This Trial Apply to Your Case?
Clinical trials inform guidelines, but every patient is unique. Our Heart Team evaluates how landmark evidence applies to your specific anatomy, risk profile, and preferences.
Send us a messageRelated Trials
Apply this evidence to your actual case.
Get an independent review from a cardiac surgeon and cardiologist in 24 hours after records are received. No referral needed — pricing is shared on your complimentary discovery call.
Or read how we review cases like this one.
