Operative perspective
The proposed operation, technical approach, alternatives, and surgical considerations.
For cardiologists
Independent perspective, with the treating cardiologist still at the center.
A cardiac surgeon and cardiologist independently review the required records and imaging, then co-sign one patient-facing report.
The review is advisory and educational. It adds a written perspective around a cardiac-surgery decision without taking over ongoing care.
Use the public form for brief, non-sensitive context only—not records or medical details.
ADVISORY RECORD REVIEWAnother perspective.
The same treating relationship.
The same treating relationship.
Designed to support the next conversation in care.
Treating care remains treating care.
The treating cardiologist and other treating clinicians remain responsible for diagnosis, testing, prescriptions, follow-up, emergency care, and treatment.Additive by design
A defined second opinion, not a change in who treats the patient.
The boundaries are as important as the report: independent review, a written output, and clinical responsibility that stays with the treating team.
- 01
Advisory by design
The review adds perspective—not ongoing care.
WHITEGLOVEMD provides an advisory, educational medical-record review around a cardiac-surgery decision.
- 02
Independent review
Each physician starts from the required case material.
The cardiac surgeon and cardiologist review independently before their perspectives are brought together.
- 03
Patient-facing output
The work returns as one co-signed report.
The patient receives a written opinion they can review with the clinicians responsible for their care.
- 04
Care responsibility
The treating relationship remains the treating relationship.
The report does not diagnose, prescribe, order testing, direct urgent care, or replace clinical follow-up.
One case. Two clinical lenses.
Independent first. Reconciled before the patient receives it.
Both physicians review the required case material, then bring their clinical perspectives into one patient-facing opinion.
See the review standardsMedical perspective
The diagnosis, testing, medical and catheter-based options, and timing.
CO-SIGNED OUTPUTOne patient-facing report
WHITEGLOVE Insights™ILLUSTRATIVE STRUCTURENO PATIENT DATA
ADVISORY SECOND OPINION
A written review for the next treating conversation.
01 · MATERIALS REVIEWEDDocumented clinical picture
02 · PHYSICIAN REASONINGCardiac surgery + cardiology
03 · OPEN QUESTIONSTradeoffs and limits made visible
The written handoff
A report the patient can bring back to treating care.
The report is organized for a patient to read and for their treating clinicians to discuss with them.
- 01
Clinical picture
The diagnosis, testing, imaging, relevant history, and proposed plan reflected in the materials reviewed.
- 02
Two specialty perspectives
How cardiac surgery and cardiology each interpret the documented decision.
- 03
Options and tradeoffs
Relevant approaches, benefits, risks, and uncertainty when supported by the available record.
- 04
Questions for the treating team
A focused agenda for the conversations, examination, and decisions that remain in treating care.
Practical boundaries
Start with context, not clinical records.
A brief conversation can clarify the service. Records and imaging belong in the appropriate workflow only after patient authorization.
Authorization comes before records
With the patient’s authorization, the team can help gather and organize the records and imaging required for review.
The public form is for brief context only
Do not include records or sensitive medical details. The team will explain the appropriate next step if records are needed.
Read the Privacy PolicyUrgent care stays local and immediate
WHITEGLOVEMD is not an emergency service. Call 911 or seek immediate local emergency care for a possible medical emergency.
A bounded place to begin
Discuss the clinical question before sharing records.
Request a complimentary call to understand what the written review includes and what materials it would require.
Do not include records or sensitive medical details in the public call-request form.