The valve leaks.
Primary MR begins in the valve apparatus. Secondary MR results from ventricular or atrial remodeling. That distinction changes how surveillance, medical or rhythm care, surgery, and TEER are considered.
Virtual mitral valve second opinion
For U.S. patients and families advised to have mitral valve surgery: specialist physicians review your imaging, proposed repair or replacement, and timing online.
No referral or call is required to purchase. Start online from home.
FIRST, NAME THE VALVE PROBLEM
Cause, anatomy, severity, symptoms, heart response, and the available procedures must be reviewed in the right clinical lane.
Primary MR begins in the valve apparatus. Secondary MR results from ventricular or atrial remodeling. That distinction changes how surveillance, medical or rhythm care, surgery, and TEER are considered.
Cause, valve area, gradients, symptoms, pulmonary pressure, rhythm, and anatomy shape whether monitoring, balloon commissurotomy, selected transcatheter approaches, or surgery belongs in the discussion.
Primary, secondary, rheumatic, calcific, or mixed disease create different clinical questions.
Symptoms, serial echocardiograms, pulmonary pressures, rhythm, exercise tolerance, and heart response help explain timing.
Leaflet motion, coaptation, annular dimensions, calcium, commissural and subvalvular findings, valve area, and gradients can change which approaches are reasonable.
Coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, other valves, and ventricular dysfunction may favor bypass, rhythm surgery, another valve procedure, or a different sequence.
Clinical boundary: repair and TEER language applies to regurgitation only when supported by the record. Stenosis follows a different decision pathway.
OPTIONS, IN CONTEXT
The review identifies only the paths that fit the documented diagnosis and anatomy. It does not promise repairability, prescribe a procedure, or replace the treating valve team.
For primary degenerative MR, repair may be preferred when a durable result is expected. Posterior, anterior, bileaflet, restricted, calcified, rheumatic, and previously treated valves raise different questions about residual regurgitation or stenosis, recurrent disease, reintervention, and a failed strategy.
Replacement may be considered when a durable repair is unlikely or inappropriate because of tissue destruction, calcification, rheumatic disease, prior treatment, or other anatomy. Mechanical and tissue valves bring different tradeoffs involving anticoagulation, durability, lifestyle, and future procedures.
TEER is not a universal substitute for surgery. It may fit selected severe symptomatic primary MR with suitable anatomy and high surgical risk, or selected secondary MR despite optimized medical therapy and CRT when indicated. Suitability includes whether the anatomy supports TEER without an excessive gradient.
The review should make the fork visible: what supports intervention now, what supports monitoring, and what finding would trigger a change?
WHITEGLOVE Insights™
The report connects the proposed treatment to the complete record, makes uncertainty visible, and prepares your next conversation with the clinicians responsible for your care.
Mechanism, severity, symptoms, serial testing, heart response, and the treating team’s proposed plan—clearly tied to the source record.
Benefits, burdens, technical considerations, and unanswered questions for repair, replacement, TEER, balloon treatment, monitoring, or another path only when it belongs in this case.
The current STS ACSD operative-risk estimate when applicable—with verified inputs, calculation date, missing data, and model limits visible. Other models appear only when documented in the source record.
Questions about timing, durability, combined procedures, lesion-specific experience, valve-program capability, geography, practical considerations, and reliable public outcomes when requested and available.
THREE PACKAGES. LIVE CONSULTATION INCLUDED.
Every package includes an independent written second opinion and a live physician consultation. Clarity provides one specialist; Collaborative adds a multidisciplinary approach when indicated; Concierge includes a multidisciplinary team and concierge access to every physician on that team through surgery day.
Compare every package detailAn independent second opinion from one specialist, with a live consultation to help you understand your options.
A coordinated second opinion with a multidisciplinary team approach when your case calls for it.
A multidisciplinary second opinion with concierge access to every physician on your reviewing team.
WHAT SHAPES THE REVIEW
A missing study does not automatically mean care was inadequate. It means the limits of the review should be visible and turned into useful questions.
Mechanism and severity, chamber size, ventricular function, pulmonary pressure, other valves, and serial change—not one number alone.
When relevant, TEE can clarify leaflet segments, coaptation, calcium, repairability, and TEER anatomy. Its absence is a question, not automatically an error.
Whether coronary disease is present and whether bypass or another coronary strategy changes the choice or sequence.
Atrial fibrillation, tricuspid or aortic valve disease, pulmonary pressure, and right-heart status may change a combined plan.
The clinical and laboratory variables needed for a defensible estimate, with missing data and model limitations shown.
Exercise tolerance, congestion, medication strategy, kidney and pulmonary status, frailty, recovery, caregiving, work, travel, anticoagulation, future procedures, and tolerance for uncertainty.
INDEPENDENT PHYSICIAN REVIEW
Your reviewing physician considers the complete record and explains the findings in a written report. Your treating clinicians remain responsible for your care.

Cardiovascular and thoracic surgeon
Reviews repairability, replacement strategy, operative access, combined procedures, and risk.
Interventional cardiologist
Reviews mechanism, severity, ventricular response, TEER context, medical therapy, and surveillance.The goal is not manufactured disagreement. It is a decision whose reasoning you can see.
Meet the physiciansHOW IT WORKS
No referral or travel is required. You can purchase first, then upload records securely.
Purchase directly or request a complimentary call if you want help comparing service levels.
Upload what you have. With your authorization, our records team can help identify and request what is missing.
Specialist physicians examine the same complete record from different clinical perspectives, then confer.
Your report is delivered in 24 hours or less, guaranteed, after all required records and imaging are received and confirmed complete.
EVIDENCE, WITH LIMITS VISIBLE
Risk estimates describe modeled outcomes for patients with similar inputs. They do not predict an individual result and do not replace clinical judgment.
Another review may help when repair, replacement, TEER, balloon treatment, or continued monitoring is being discussed and you want to understand the mechanism, timing, repairability, alternative approaches, individual risk, or whether another cardiac problem changes the plan. It should not delay urgent or time-sensitive care directed by your treating team.
Sometimes, but not every valve is durably repairable. The answer depends on the actual mechanism, leaflet and annular anatomy, calcification, tissue quality, prior procedures, and experience relevant to that lesion. The review organizes what the available imaging suggests, what remains uncertain, and why repair or replacement is being proposed without promising a repair result.
Primary mitral regurgitation begins with disease of the valve apparatus, such as prolapse or a flail leaflet. Secondary regurgitation occurs because changes in the ventricle or atrium prevent the leaflets from meeting normally. The distinction matters because the roles of repair, replacement, TEER, medical therapy, rhythm treatment, and monitoring can differ.
Yes. Mitral regurgitation is a leaking valve; mitral stenosis is a narrowed valve. Stenosis raises different questions about cause, valve area and gradients, symptoms, rhythm and clot-prevention context, anatomy, and whether monitoring, balloon commissurotomy, selected transcatheter approaches, or surgery is relevant. Repair and TEER language on this page applies to regurgitation only when supported by the record.
TEER is not a universal alternative to surgery. It may be considered for selected patients with severe symptomatic primary MR, suitable anatomy, and high surgical risk; and for selected patients with severe symptomatic secondary MR despite optimized guideline-directed heart-failure therapy and cardiac resynchronization when indicated. Ventricular status, pulmonary pressure, anatomy, excessive-gradient risk, and assessment by the treating multidisciplinary valve team also matter. A catheter procedure is not automatically better or less appropriate than surgery.
Yes, when replacement is a relevant option. The report can organize tradeoffs involving durability, lifelong anticoagulation, bleeding and clotting considerations, lifestyle, pregnancy considerations when relevant, and possible future procedures. It does not prescribe a prosthesis; the final choice belongs with you and your treating physicians.
The exact record depends on the decision. It commonly includes transthoracic echocardiogram images and reports, TEE images and report when performed or clinically relevant, catheterization or coronary assessment, clinical notes, laboratory results, medication history, rhythm information, and the proposed plan. With your authorization, the records team can help identify and request what is needed.
Specialist physicians independently review the same complete record, confer, and complete one patient-facing WHITEGLOVE Insights™ report. Expert perspectives are included in every package.
WhiteGlove Clarity is $995, Collaborative is $1,495, and Concierge is $1,995. Every package includes a written second opinion and live physician consultation. Clarity provides one specialist; Collaborative adds a multidisciplinary approach when indicated; Concierge includes a multidisciplinary team and concierge access to all physicians on that team through surgery day. These are one-time, direct-pay packages. You can purchase online or request a complimentary call.
Your report is delivered in 24 hours or less, guaranteed, after all required records and imaging are received and confirmed complete. Time spent gathering missing records is outside the 24-hour window.
No. WHITEGLOVEMD provides independent educational decision support and medical-record review. It does not diagnose, prescribe, perform procedures, provide emergency care, or replace the physicians responsible for your treatment.
THE DECISION STAYS YOURS
Start with a free discovery call, or choose a second-opinion package and begin online.