Source before summary
The medical record—not a marketing promise—anchors the clinical review.
PHYSICIAN PANEL · EXPRESSION OF INTEREST
Bring your judgment to the decision before heart surgery.
WHITEGLOVEMD is building a physician-led cardiac second-opinion service around a simple standard: the source record should be checked, uncertainty should be visible, and the final educational review should reflect physician judgment.
This is an interest pathway, not a job listing or promise of panel acceptance, assignments, compensation, or a response. Please do not email patient information or PHI.
NO BLANKET PROMISES
Participation details depend on a physician’s background, the company’s current needs, and terms that have not been offered on this public page.
WHY THIS PANEL EXISTS
Patients need a review that survives contact with the complete record.
A patient facing heart surgery may be comparing an operation, a catheter-based procedure, medical therapy, continued evaluation, or a combination of approaches. The useful second opinion is the one that places those choices beside the patient’s actual record.
The role of a physician reviewer is not to produce generic reassurance. It is to check the source, identify what is missing or conflicting, apply relevant clinical judgment, and make the next treating-team conversation more precise.
WHAT THE WORK REQUIRES
Clinical rigor without invented certainty.
The public service model is built around defensible review principles. Exact reviewer responsibilities and terms are addressed separately before participation.
Two relevant perspectives
The service is built around cardiac-surgery and cardiology review of the same submitted record.
Judgment stays human
Tools can organize information. Physicians remain responsible for checking the source and applying clinical judgment.
Uncertainty is documented
Missing information, conflicting records, and limits of the available evidence should remain visible.
THE INTEREST PROCESS
A clear first step. No implied offer.
Begin with enough professional context for the team to understand your background. Any later participation depends on a separate evaluation and confirmed terms.
Introduce yourself
Send your name, specialty, current professional role, and a link to a public physician profile or CV. Do not send patient information or protected health information.
We review the fit
The team reviews your introduction against the needs of the current cardiac second-opinion service. An introduction is not an application to employment and does not guarantee panel acceptance.
Discuss the details
If there may be a fit, the team will contact you about the information, agreements, and participation terms required for further evaluation.
Confirm before reviewing
No case-review assignment is implied by sending an introduction. Scope, availability, compensation, and other terms must be confirmed separately before participation.
Ready to introduce yourself?
Email the panel teamUse “Physician panel interest” in the subject line. Do not attach patient records or case material.
BEFORE YOU EXPRESS INTEREST
Your professional obligations still come first.
This page cannot determine whether outside review activity is permitted in your individual circumstances.
Review your agreements
Consider employment terms, institutional policies, medical-staff bylaws, conflicts rules, and other restrictions that apply to you.
Do not assume coverage
No malpractice, credentialing, licensure, or insurance assurance is made by this page.
Keep PHI out of recruitment email
An expression of interest should contain professional information only—never patient records or identifiable case details.
PHYSICIAN PANEL FAQ
What this page does—and does not—promise.
Direct answers are more useful than recruitment superlatives.
Is this a job posting?+
No. This page is a physician-panel expression-of-interest pathway. It is not an offer of employment, an independent-contractor offer, or a promise of interview, acceptance, compensation, or case volume.
Which physicians should express interest?+
The current cardiac second-opinion service is most directly relevant to cardiac surgeons and cardiologists. If your subspecialty is adjacent to those decisions, identify it clearly in your introduction so the team can assess whether there is a current need.
What should I include in my introduction?+
Include your full name, specialty and subspecialty, current professional role, states of licensure, and a link to a public institutional profile, professional profile, or CV. Do not include patient records, case details, or protected health information.
Are assignments or a minimum workload guaranteed?+
No. This page makes no promise about panel acceptance, assignment frequency, minimum workload, turnaround expectations, or ongoing participation.
How are compensation and participation terms handled?+
This page does not publish or promise a compensation rate or benefit package. Any applicable scope, compensation, scheduling expectations, and participation terms would be discussed and documented separately before work begins.
Will participation conflict with my hospital or practice agreement?+
The company cannot make that determination for you. Physicians should review their employment agreement, medical-staff bylaws, institutional policies, licensure obligations, and any other professional restrictions before agreeing to participate.
Does this page make a malpractice or insurance promise?+
No. Nothing on this page is a legal, credentialing, malpractice, or insurance-coverage assurance. Those questions depend on the final scope and terms and must be addressed before participation.
When will I hear back?+
There is no guaranteed response or review timeline. If your background appears relevant to a current need, the team may contact you for additional information or a conversation.
START WITH PROFESSIONAL CONTEXT
Tell us where your expertise meets the cardiac decision.
A concise introduction is enough for the first step. Include your clinical focus and a public professional-profile or CV link. Do not include PHI.
