Diagnosis, testing, medical and catheter-based considerations
Online cardiology second opinion
A clearer view before your next heart-care decision.
A cardiac surgeon and cardiologist independently review the required records and imaging, then co-sign one patient-facing report.
Understand the diagnosis, current plan, reasonable alternatives, and what to ask next.
No referral or records are needed to request a call. Keep sensitive health information out of the public form.
THE REQUIRED CASE MATERIALRecords + imaging
One complete clinical picture
Operative considerations, alternatives, and timing
REVIEWED + CO-SIGNEDOne patient-facing report
Clearer context for the next treating conversation
When another perspective may help
Start with the decision—not a search for a different answer.
A second opinion can confirm the direction, compare reasonable options, or show what still needs discussion.
- 01
The diagnosis or severity still feels unclear
See what the available records agree on—and where uncertainty remains.
- 02
More than one treatment path may be reasonable
Place medical, catheter-based, and surgical considerations beside the proposed plan.
- 03
You need to understand why the timing matters
Clarify the documented reasons to act, monitor, or gather more information.
- 04
You want sharper questions for your care team
Turn a complicated record into a focused agenda for your clinicians.
Common review questions may involve coronary disease, heart valves, heart failure or cardiomyopathy, rhythm disorders, and aortic disease. Scope depends on the question and available material.
One record · two clinical lenses
Independent review first. One accountable written opinion after.
Cardiology considers the diagnosis, testing, medical treatment, and catheter-based paths. Cardiac surgery considers operative approaches, alternatives, and surgical timing. The report brings both perspectives together without replacing treating care.
See the review standardsCARDIOLOGIST
Diagnosis + medical perspectiveCARDIAC SURGEON
Operative + technical perspectiveONE CO-SIGNED OUTPUTWHITEGLOVE Insights™
The written deliverable
Built for the conversation that comes next.
The report is built to understand and bring back to your clinicians.
- 01
Clinical picture
The diagnosis, testing, imaging, and proposed plan reflected in the materials reviewed.
- 02
Two specialty perspectives
How cardiology and cardiac surgery each interpret the documented decision.
- 03
Options and tradeoffs
Reasonable paths and uncertainty supported by the available record.
- 04
Questions to take back
A concise agenda for the next conversation with the treating team.
HOW IT WORKS
- 01
Define the question
Begin with a complimentary call or request the written review. Keep records out of the public form.
- 02
Complete the case material
With your authorization, the team identifies the records and imaging required.
- 03
Receive the co-signed report
Both physicians review independently before contributing to one report.
Clear expectations
A defined review with important boundaries.
Collection time is separate, and the opinion supports—not substitutes for—treating care.
The report is delivered within 24 hours after all required records and imaging are received and confirmed complete. Time needed to collect missing materials is separate.
The written report does not include a live physician consultation. A live discussion may be arranged separately when appropriate and available.
Your treating clinicians remain responsible for diagnosis, prescriptions, testing, follow-up, and treatment. WHITEGLOVEMD does not direct emergency care.
A simple place to begin
Tell us the decision you are trying to understand.
Request a complimentary call to discuss the written review and what it may require.
Do not include medical records or sensitive health information in the public call-request form.