WHITEGLOVE Heart Team
Two independent reads.One accountable conclusion.


TRUST IS PART OF THE PRODUCT
A high-stakes cardiac decision deserves more than a polished summary. It deserves two accountable physicians, visible evidence, honest limitations, and one report you can take back to your treating team.

WHITEGLOVE Heart Team
Two independent reads.THE REVIEW STANDARD
Cardiac surgery and cardiology do not always ask the same questions. The review preserves both perspectives and makes the signed conclusion legible to the patient.
The cardiac surgeon and cardiologist receive the records and imaging required for the review—not two partial versions of the case.
Each physician examines the evidence through a different clinical lens before the two perspectives are brought together.
The physicians confer, review the patient-facing conclusion, and co-sign one WHITEGLOVE Insights™ report.
THE REPORT SHOULD SHOW ITS WORK
The purpose is not to create a more confident-looking score. It is to make the reasoning easier to inspect: what came from your chart, what came from published evidence, what remains uncertain, and what two physicians concluded.
Read about clinical rigorClinical details are organized from the materials supplied for review, with missing or unresolved information kept visible.
Guidelines and validated risk models are used when they apply to the decision and the available inputs.
STS PROM, EuroSCORE II, and AATS are presented as separate models. Their inputs, gaps, and limitations are not hidden.
Technology can organize information; the reviewing physicians remain responsible for the clinical interpretation and signed report.
Technology
organizes.
HUMAN ACCOUNTABILITY
Technology can help structure the chart, surface potential gaps, compare model inputs, and prepare patient-facing explanations. The cardiac surgeon and cardiologist still review the evidence, reconcile the conclusion, and sign the final report.
YOUR INFORMATION
The workflow is built around authorization, limited clinical purpose, and a clear return to you—not around quietly moving your case through an invisible network.
You authorize records requests before the records team asks another practice or facility for information.
You can upload records through the patient workflow or ask the records team to help collect what is missing.
Medical information is handled through systems and workflows intended for healthcare records and case coordination.
The review is shared with you through your account. You decide how to use it with your current treating team.
CLEAR BOUNDARIES
WHITEGLOVEMD does not diagnose, prescribe, establish procedure candidacy, or provide emergency care.
When program information is relevant, the report identifies it as public context rather than presenting it as a private partnership or guaranteed result.
Missing inputs, incomplete testing, and reasonable disagreement are decision-relevant information—not imperfections to conceal.
TRUST & SAFETY FAQ
Still unsure whether the service fits your situation? Request a complimentary orientation call before you purchase.
A cardiac surgeon and cardiologist independently review the complete case, confer, and co-sign one WHITEGLOVE Insights™ report. Technology supports organization and drafting, but the physicians are responsible for the clinical interpretation and signed conclusion.
No. Technology can help extract, organize, compare, and present information from the record. The reviewing cardiac surgeon and cardiologist examine the case and remain responsible for the report they sign.
WHITEGLOVEMD uses healthcare-focused systems and controlled workflows for record intake, case coordination, physician review, and report delivery. You authorize outside record requests, and the completed review is delivered through your account. See the Privacy Policy for additional detail.
No. WHITEGLOVEMD provides independent medical-record review and educational decision support. Your current treating clinicians remain responsible for diagnosis, prescriptions, procedure candidacy, treatment, and emergency care.
Validated models such as STS PROM, EuroSCORE II, and AATS are considered separately when applicable. The report can show missing inputs, uncertainty, and model limitations so a score is not mistaken for the whole clinical picture.
The WHITEGLOVE Composite Score is a proprietary framework intended to place several risk perspectives beside the clinical record. It is clearly distinguished from independently validated risk models and should not be treated as a diagnosis, guarantee, or replacement for physician judgment.
The 24-hour window begins only after the records and imaging required for the review have been received and confirmed complete. If important information is missing, the records team identifies the gap and can help with collection.
Yes. The report is designed to make unresolved questions, missing inputs, and additional studies to consider visible instead of burying them inside a single conclusion.
The review may use public, procedure-specific information to help you understand surgeon and center fit when relevant. The report is designed to explain the basis for consideration, not to imply an undisclosed hospital partnership or guarantee an outcome.
WHITEGLOVEMD is not an emergency service. Call 911 or seek immediate local emergency care for chest pain, severe shortness of breath, fainting, new weakness, or other urgent symptoms.
START WITH THE EVIDENCE
Begin with the two-physician written review, or request a complimentary call to understand the process first.
