WHITEGLOVEMD
Skip to content
WHITEGLOVEMD

TRUST IS PART OF THE PRODUCT

You should know who reviewed your heart—and how the answer was built.

A high-stakes cardiac decision deserves more than a polished summary. It deserves two accountable physicians, visible evidence, honest limitations, and one report you can take back to your treating team.

2independent physician perspectives1co-signed patient-facing report24 hrafter required records and imaging are complete
A physician having a focused conversation about a cardiac decision

WHITEGLOVE Heart Team

Two independent reads.
One accountable conclusion.

THE REVIEW STANDARD

Trust is designed into the handoff.

Cardiac surgery and cardiology do not always ask the same questions. The review preserves both perspectives and makes the signed conclusion legible to the patient.

01

The same complete record

The cardiac surgeon and cardiologist receive the records and imaging required for the review—not two partial versions of the case.

02

Two independent reads

Each physician examines the evidence through a different clinical lens before the two perspectives are brought together.

03

One accountable report

The physicians confer, review the patient-facing conclusion, and co-sign one WHITEGLOVE Insights™ report.

THE REPORT SHOULD SHOW ITS WORK

A useful answer separates the record, the models, and physician judgment.

The purpose is not to create a more confident-looking score. It is to make the reasoning easier to inspect: what came from your chart, what came from published evidence, what remains uncertain, and what two physicians concluded.

Read about clinical rigor
01

Source record

Clinical details are organized from the materials supplied for review, with missing or unresolved information kept visible.

02

Published evidence

Guidelines and validated risk models are used when they apply to the decision and the available inputs.

03

Model boundaries

STS PROM, EuroSCORE II, and AATS are presented as separate models. Their inputs, gaps, and limitations are not hidden.

04

Physician judgment

Technology can organize information; the reviewing physicians remain responsible for the clinical interpretation and signed report.

Technology
organizes.

Physicians
decide.

HUMAN ACCOUNTABILITY

AI can help prepare the case. It does not sign your report.

Technology can help structure the chart, surface potential gaps, compare model inputs, and prepare patient-facing explanations. The cardiac surgeon and cardiologist still review the evidence, reconcile the conclusion, and sign the final report.

ORGANIZEVERIFYCONFERCO-SIGN

YOUR INFORMATION

You should know what happens to your records.

The workflow is built around authorization, limited clinical purpose, and a clear return to you—not around quietly moving your case through an invisible network.

  1. 01

    You authorize records requests before the records team asks another practice or facility for information.

  2. 02

    You can upload records through the patient workflow or ask the records team to help collect what is missing.

  3. 03

    Medical information is handled through systems and workflows intended for healthcare records and case coordination.

  4. 04

    The review is shared with you through your account. You decide how to use it with your current treating team.

CLEAR BOUNDARIES

A second opinion should strengthen the next conversation—not pretend to replace your care.

01

Your treating team remains your treating team.

WHITEGLOVEMD does not diagnose, prescribe, establish procedure candidacy, or provide emergency care.

02

Public data stays public data.

When program information is relevant, the report identifies it as public context rather than presenting it as a private partnership or guaranteed result.

03

Uncertainty belongs in the report.

Missing inputs, incomplete testing, and reasonable disagreement are decision-relevant information—not imperfections to conceal.

TRUST & SAFETY FAQ

Questions you should ask before sharing your cardiac record.

Still unsure whether the service fits your situation? Request a complimentary orientation call before you purchase.

Who is responsible for my cardiac second opinion?

A cardiac surgeon and cardiologist independently review the complete case, confer, and co-sign one WHITEGLOVE Insights™ report. Technology supports organization and drafting, but the physicians are responsible for the clinical interpretation and signed conclusion.

Does artificial intelligence make the final medical decision?

No. Technology can help extract, organize, compare, and present information from the record. The reviewing cardiac surgeon and cardiologist examine the case and remain responsible for the report they sign.

How does WHITEGLOVEMD protect my medical records?

WHITEGLOVEMD uses healthcare-focused systems and controlled workflows for record intake, case coordination, physician review, and report delivery. You authorize outside record requests, and the completed review is delivered through your account. See the Privacy Policy for additional detail.

Will my current surgeon or cardiologist lose control of my care?

No. WHITEGLOVEMD provides independent medical-record review and educational decision support. Your current treating clinicians remain responsible for diagnosis, prescriptions, procedure candidacy, treatment, and emergency care.

How are surgical risk estimates handled?

Validated models such as STS PROM, EuroSCORE II, and AATS are considered separately when applicable. The report can show missing inputs, uncertainty, and model limitations so a score is not mistaken for the whole clinical picture.

What is the WHITEGLOVE Composite Score?

The WHITEGLOVE Composite Score is a proprietary framework intended to place several risk perspectives beside the clinical record. It is clearly distinguished from independently validated risk models and should not be treated as a diagnosis, guarantee, or replacement for physician judgment.

When does the 24-hour review window begin?

The 24-hour window begins only after the records and imaging required for the review have been received and confirmed complete. If important information is missing, the records team identifies the gap and can help with collection.

Can I see what information was missing from my case?

Yes. The report is designed to make unresolved questions, missing inputs, and additional studies to consider visible instead of burying them inside a single conclusion.

Does WHITEGLOVEMD recommend a particular hospital?

The review may use public, procedure-specific information to help you understand surgeon and center fit when relevant. The report is designed to explain the basis for consideration, not to imply an undisclosed hospital partnership or guarantee an outcome.

What should I do if I have urgent symptoms?

WHITEGLOVEMD is not an emergency service. Call 911 or seek immediate local emergency care for chest pain, severe shortness of breath, fainting, new weakness, or other urgent symptoms.

START WITH THE EVIDENCE

A second set of experts before the first incision.

Begin with the two-physician written review, or request a complimentary call to understand the process first.

A couple having a thoughtful conversation outdoors